Download App
Better Online and Trade Show Sourcing Experiences.Scan the QR code to download.
Learn More
Hot Topics
By Renaud Anjoran
Quality inspectors are human like the rest of us, and while it’s usually unlikely that they will let major QC issues slip through the net, it can happen.
Let’s examine why and how this happens, and how to mitigate or stop these mistakes…
What can cause professional quality inspectors to miss QC issues?
Performing a quality inspection prior to a shipment is like a filter. It won’t catch 100% of the problems 100% of the time. But it should catch the BIG issues over 90% of the time.
More and more importers are disillusioned about the value of QC inspections. Many of them think (and, depending on who they work with, they are not necessarily wrong) that way, way less than 90% of BIG QC issues are detected.
And they usually think that bribery is the main reason for this lack of effectiveness. However, I don’t agree.
I’ve listed below the major reasons why Chinese inspectors sometimes fail to notice quality control issues that are BIG in their clients’ eyes.
1. Laziness and lack of discipline
Most professional inspectors are guilty of this.
For example, they don’t pick cartons from every side and every height of the pile, not only to save time but also to avoid bothering the factory.
There are actually 2 separate issues here:
1.1 They take shortcuts to go faster
A very common example: during the visual check or the testing, they often don’t check as many samples as they should.
As a result, their report is based on their guesses after checking a sample size that is much smaller than their QC plan calls for. The statistical plan is not respected, and in the worst cases, the report means nothing at all.
1.2 They are unwilling to bother the factory
Many of them are tired of fighting. They want to work in a relaxed atmosphere, have a nice lunch, and avoid justifying themselves after complaints from the supplier.
For instance, they let the factory check (and repair!) the samples by themselves during the unpacking process. They pretend not to see this little game. And, of course, many problems are corrected before the inspection.
Is this bribery? Yes and no. More about this phenomenon here.
2. Lack of training
When they need to check garments, some quality control agencies see no problem in sending inspectors who have a very superficial knowledge of textile products. Some sophisticated clients can suspect it after reading the QC report, but it is difficult to prove.
These inspectors are very slow in taking measurements, so they ask the factory to measure… and they write what they are told. Oh, and there are many issues that their untrained eye just can’t notice.
This is just an example. The same thing happens with electronics, ceramics, furniture, etc.
3. Wrong calibration
As I wrote last week, QC Inspectors cannot follow different quality standards.
Send an inspector who is used to checking cheap products for monitoring a production of goods to be sold in high-end boutiques, and what will he conclude? “Everything is fine”. The reason is, it is so much nicer to what he usually sees.
Unfortunately, the high-end buyer might see defects that are important to him and that were completely undetected during the inspection.
If you work with QC firms that work for cheap buyers (promotional goods, mass markets in South America…), don’t ask them to check high-quality products.
4. Poor timing of inspection
Many buyers don’t understand why ONLY a final inspection (after production is over) can confirm the average quality of a batch.
When everything is packed, the quantity can be counted, and products can be picked randomly. The factory can’t play games.
What often happens is that suppliers are late. The job gets done when only 20% of the goods are completed, and maybe 1 or 2 cartons are packed. It is easy for a factory to hide the defective products and claim they are not made yet.
What to do in this case? A re-inspection at the supplier’s charge. Naturally, most Chinese suppliers pretend not to understand why they should pay for a re-inspection in this case, since the job got done.
So you should think now about the instructions to your QC agency/staff: should they abort the mission in such cases?
5. Rushed job
When an inspector is under intense timing pressure, he is forced to take all the shortcuts he can. There are actually 2 separate issues:
5.1 The inspector’s manager decides on an unrealistic sampling plan
This happens when the client is allowed to choose the sampling size in an online booking system, or when the QC company does not dare to say no to a client. It happens often in peak periods, like before Chinese New Year.
I have seen sampling plans including 8 different product references to check for conformity, and a total of 315 pieces to check visually, in 1 man-day! The result is the same as in point 1.1: the job is not done fully, and the report means nothing.
5.2 The inspector himself compresses the time of the job
After a few rushed jobs (see point 5.1), inspectors know they can get done in 2 hours.
Some of them conclude that they can do one job in the morning (for their employer) and one in the afternoon (on a freelance basis). This is a highly dangerous habit!
6. Corruption
Yes, corruption happens. Especially in situations with the following characteristics:
I already described the way corruption works in a previous article. The point is, it is not as frequent as most people think.
7. Unclear or incomplete specifications
If you don’t communicate detailed requirements, and if you don’t ensure that the inspector has a reference sample in hand, you are asking for trouble.
This may seem obvious. But tens (hundreds?) of unprofessional or inexperienced importers commit this mistake. In the China sourcing game, letting another party guess some information is never a good idea.
This product specifications template for importers in China can help you to provide better specifications.
***
Oh, and how about factory interference? I am not including it in this list, because an inspector who doesn’t cut corners (see point 1.1 above) will avoid it. And, if it can’t be avoided, the job should be aborted.
What do you think? Am I forgetting an important cause that affects quality inspectors’ ability to spot QC issues?
***
You may also like these resources…
Interested in learning more about QC inspectors and inspections? Read these posts:
Editor’s note: This post was first published in 2012, but has been updated and republished.
Sofeast: Quality Assurance In China Or Vietnam For Beginners [eBook]
This free eBook shows importers who are new to outsourcing production to China or Vietnam the five key foundations of a proven Quality Assurance strategy, and also shows you some common traps that importers fall into and how to avoid or overcome them in order to get the best possible production results.
Ready to get your copy? Hit the button below:
The views, opinions and images in this article are purely the author’s own. Global Sources does not own responsibility for what is presented in the article.
Renaud Anjoran has been managing his quality assurance agency (Sofeast Ltd) since 2006. In addition, a passion for improving the way people work has pushed him to launch a consultancy to improve factories and a web application to manage the purchasing process. He writes advice for importers on qualityinspection.org.
More Sourcing News
Read Also