Download App
Better Online and Trade Show Sourcing Experiences.Scan the QR code to download.
Learn More
Hot Topics
Customer Relationship Management (CRM) enables companies to transition from product management to customer management. Its concept is simple and straightforward: the interaction between the company and its customers is based on a common information system extending in all directions.
In fact, CRM has changed the competitive landscape, distinguishing companies that sell products from companies that own customers. While the requirements for product reliability have not changed at the product and business unit level, having all customer information in one place allows companies to analyze the full financial impact of customer-company interactions, not just Is the impact on a single product line or business unit. The new analytics system supports the idea that customers are a company's most important asset. In order to achieve the goals of CRM, your company's financial management can no longer go the same way.
A question like "How profitable is a customer or group of customers?" is not the same as "What was the profit of product X last year?" Analyzing customer profitability requires collaboration and information from all departments and sales channels in the company Summary: Sales provides information on how to win customers, Marketing provides up-sell and cross-sell data, Customer Service provides information on quality assurance and service activities, and Finance provides revenue and cost data information. Data integration requires the centralization of off-the-shelf, disparate data in order to create a reliable customer database that is known across the company.
Some companies try to skip this step, assuming that their analysts can find the information they need, sort it out, tweak and analyze it, and then provide data on a project-by-project basis. This view is wrong for the following reasons:
For a successful CRM implementation, customer analysis must become a long-term task of financial analysis. The over-the-top approach overwhelms us with too many opportunities, leading to incoherence, frequent mistakes, and misinterpretation. Moreover, such methods create procrastination: taking six weeks or more, yielding reports of little value.
Establishing a central database will force the company to address key issues, and you must complete customer definition, cost, benefit and profit analysis, which is then validated by the business team. It's also important to be clear about the CRM's goals and evaluation methods. In short, treating CRM financial analysis as a series of one-off jobs that go it alone will get you down a dead end.
The three major financial analysis of CRM
When building a central customer database, you need to figure out what data to put in it. Many companies are beginning to realize that the ready-made systems do not contain the required data, or the data is in the wrong format to allow Finance to perform its three CRM functions: customer profitability analysis, budgeting and forecasting, and CRM effectiveness management.
Client Profitability Analysis EDS recently conducted a study for a client to understand which media (direct mail, telemarketing, Internet, magazine advertising, TV advertising) generated more revenue. The study used the lifetime value analysis method, which analyzes the net present value of a customer by calculating the cash flow generated by the customer's interaction with the company.
The method of determining cash flow is very simple. In order to facilitate the calculation of expenses, the accounting system is designed to collect the turnover figures obtained from the client. Each payment record of the client is clearly marked with the amount and time. However, matching costs to customers is tricky, because the current accounting system has the following shortcomings: it can only collect real-world sales information from customers, and does not include pre-sales and after-sales activities that do not lead to sales results. Costs; even for costs that are directly related to sales, such as product costs, accounting systems can only add up individual transactions from different customers to calculate "cost of products sold"; this isolation maintained by accounting systems , resulting in a lack of common customer identification capabilities, leaving people at a loss for cross-system analysis.
Obviously, these flaws in the accounting system are incompatible with the requirement to conduct a customer profitability analysis. CRM requires that a single, valid customer identification code must be established, the revenue and cost figures generated by the buying and selling activities must be collected from the client, and the indirect cost of "customer-company interaction" must be allocated to the customer. It should be recognized that although there is a consensus on customer profitability, there is still some disagreement on how to achieve it. So, which activities to measure, and what exactly the financial impact of those activities will be, these decisions will ultimately differentiate the strengths and weaknesses of different companies.
The main difference between budgeting and forecasting CRM and traditional budgeting and forecasting methods is that the latter uses isolated product-service categories to separate sales and customers, while the former provides a company-wide Because of the differences in the way companies link with their customers, CRM models can be divided into two types, "activity-based" and "continuity-based".
The 'activity-based' CRM forecasting model is suitable for companies that consistently and repeatedly sell products, such as catalog merchandise sellers. When they sell new products to existing customers, they must send a new catalog. One characteristic of such companies is their likelihood of getting customer orders: how often customers order and whether customers have placed orders recently. Therefore, the analysis provided by a customer forecasting model must be based on factors such as expected marketing campaigns, how often customers order and how many months have passed since their last purchase.
In contrast, businesses operating on an "existence-based" model either sell follow-on products (such as telephone or equipment dealers), or regularly launch some products (such as books, records, or perishables) for customers to buy on a regular basis. Unlike "activity-based" businesses, "existence-based" businesses aim not to get the next order, but to keep existing customers. Of course, it is unrealistic to expect service providers to offer too much to customers, since customers can only consume a certain amount of products at a certain time. In this mode, predictive model analysis focuses on consumption and customer base over a certain period of time.
With the above in mind, your company needs to determine how to improve your product-centric forecasting and budgeting models to focus on customer-centricity. Early reaction is important because existing systems can only provide some data, and other parts need to be done from scratch.
Another important thing is to differentiate between customer groups, the interrelationships of the various business units of the company, and the different characteristics of each stage of the customer life cycle. Only when these factors are taken into account can the financial impact of customer activity be revealed. Managing a company's customer base is like managing a portfolio, you have to find a balance between how to acquire new customers and how to maintain old ones.
Effectiveness Management for CRM As with any other change management, successful CRM implementation requires clear financial and operational goals, as well as setting appropriate metrics, and these things need to be done right from the start. The finance department will find this job difficult, as it is still difficult to calculate the profitability of the customer and build a forecasting model for the customer. The company's product structure makes it relatively easy for managers to calculate sales and profits, but often has no idea how to accomplish goals like "customer retention."
The problem isn't just a lack of proper data, it's a vague CRM goal, often expressed in non-financial terms. For example, retailers and catalog sellers often use "time since last purchase" to measure customer retention. Conversely, phone and equipment makers use metrics such as "how many customers are willing to continue using a service without interruption", and magazine publishers calculate "how many customers renew their magazines."
Therefore, it is imperative to define goals that are clear throughout the company. After all, the value of a customer-centric mindset lies not only in its ability to assess the financial impact of a company's CRM strategy, but also in the fact that it encourages collaboration and collaboration.
The second step is to decompose the target, and this process is the same as the refinement process for other targets. For example, in order for a bank to increase the number of checking customers from 40% to 60% within three years, management needs to know in advance, before the task is completed, the financial impact of the goal and how to measure progress. Therefore, the work of the Finance Department is to refine the overall goal into sub-indicators to be completed in stages. In this way, after three years, there are no surprises for management, because the different methods used to achieve the goal are clear, and the costs incurred at different stages of the goal completion process can be broken down.
The ability to conduct financial analysis of customers is critical to every company implementing CRM. The following pitfalls should be avoided.
Since there is no fixed roadmap to success, Finance takes the lead in this process, which requires exploring new approaches rather than just tinkering with the past.
In an effort to match accounting systems in terms of data reliability, finance departments often spend too much time checking figures from different sources. This wish is actually difficult to achieve, because the customer data obtained from different business units has its own accounting chart, and after being loaded into the company's CRM database, the customer identification code cannot be adjusted back to the original system.
Accountants like to use the accrual method to match revenue and cost figures. According to the requirements of the accrual method, revenue must be recognized once a sale has occurred. This approach makes sense in retail, but not in other areas. For example, if a subscriber pays for a year's subscription in advance, under the accrual method, once the subscriber receives the magazine, revenue for the entire year is recognized. But in the CRM state, when doing a customer lifetime value analysis, we're evaluating the actual cash inflows.
Management of huge data in CRM system is a big challenge. Mastering the knowledge of blank table program analysis is far from enough for us to cope with it. Analysts must be proficient in using databases, familiar with data structures, and proficient in basic knowledge of programming.
Rethinking the reliability of analytical results, the current accounting system only holds managers accountable for their actions and does not encourage collaboration and knowledge sharing.
CRM software is not a solution, a set of software cannot make a company smarter or more customer friendly, it can only make a company do it faster, better or worse.
To avoid falling into this trap, the finance department must be involved in the planning stage of the project. As the guard of the company's property, the finance department must strictly observe financial discipline in the implementation of CRM. The finance department can also provide unique and important perspectives on IT systems—relevance, reliability, on-time completion, and accuracy. These traditional accounting principles apply equally to analyzing data from different sources.
Last but not least, take your time, start small and accomplish some attainable goals. This way, as the project unfolds, you can test the validity of the current version and adopt the right approach early on.
This text is adapted from Thomas F. Richebacher's The money shift, Intelligent Enterprise Magazine, Volume 6, Issue 5, March 20, 2003, with permission from Information Week, CMP Media LLC (http://www.intelligententerprise.com ), Copyright 2003 by CMP Media LLC. Translated by Yang Tong.
Working together to do a good job in CRM
Among the many definitions of CRM, the one that can best grasp its gist is: on a dynamic basis, all processes and systems of an enterprise respond to customer needs. promise. However, even under this definition, the concept of CRM is not perfect, because the following part is missing: providing personalized products and services at a price that customers are willing to accept, and this part of the content requires the realignment of business processes around CRM.
There is an OEM manufacturer specializing in the production of car seats, which can provide personalized products to different customers. Before implementing the OEM project, the company needed two to three months to adjust its supply chain according to customer requirements. Due to such a "time lag", each part of the supply chain has a different understanding of their tasks in a given period of time. As a result, companies stock different parts, the expense of maintaining inventory increases, and the drain on working capital increases.
Implementing a CRM project in such an environment -- offering personalized solutions at a price that customers are willing to accept and reducing turnaround time -- is like putting out a fire with oil. The increase in inventory maintenance and working capital costs skyrocketed the total product cost, scaring off customers as a result. Therefore, in order for CRM projects to be implemented effectively, business processes and support systems must be redesigned across the entire supply chain.
Clarify the goals of CRM
At the beginning, all stakeholders from OEM manufacturers to supply chain--Vice President of Sales, Chief Auditor, Director of Purchasing--gathered together for a one-day event. "Vision Planning Meeting", the central topic of the meeting is to work together to consider issues from the customer's standpoint, and to carry out customer relationship management based on this.
At the meeting, two major issues surfaced: first, to reduce the turnaround time for communicating with customers throughout the supply chain; second, to reduce the occupation of working capital and inventory throughout the supply chain, Reduce the cost of unplanned transportation and make products more in line with customer requirements.
The challenge of solving this problem was evident as attendees examined each step in detail. At first glance, it is not difficult to implement each step individually, but if you look carefully, there is a "domino effect" in the entire supply chain, and the magnification effect of this effect is very significant. For example, in reality, a little adjustment by a customer to an existing order will make a big change in the "work-in-process inventory", and the same phenomenon will also occur in the supply process "in transit" products" (intermediate goods in shipments), that's for sure.
This entails addressing the toughest parts of CRM—product and service information, field service management, etc.—forcing these stakeholders to prioritize the problems faced by different areas, on a per-CRM basis The commercial benefits and operational possibilities of the outputs are formulated. For example, CRM solutions cover functions such as marketing automation systems, sales, product and service information, and product and service configuration, but there are only a few functions that are believed to solve the most pressing problems. This way, the task is relatively easy because everyone has identified the problem that needs to be solved first. Finally, two to four months were allotted for each implementable process and system from the "visioning meeting" to the official launch.
Establish a CRM team
Various stakeholders also decided to establish a team to provide acceptable solutions for the entire supply chain, the team must be qualified, have the appropriate authority and can work closely with the company's top management Contact, the leadership of the team comes from outside the OEM, which is critical to gaining the trust of supply chain partners. Moreover, for the nomination of members to be recognized by the entire supply chain, they must have extensive production management experience. In addition, it is important that they are empowered to make decisions about the processes involved, as they "sell" their redesigned processes to their respective departments.
Various departments of the company have also come up with some non-CRM solutions. These functions and features also contribute to the success of the project. Supply chain partners also hope to implement certain modules of the project in the above environment. The IT departments of OEMs and supply chain partners will need some new hardware and corresponding software upgrades. In short, when the team is believed to be successful in accomplishing their goals, the entire supply chain hopes to add some "fat" to them, and the team always succeeds in completing the set task in the end.
More Sourcing News
Read Also